Journal: admin
The reason that I have chosen these two alternatives to AdSense is because they are large enough to sustain a large number of advertisers, they offer clean and unique integrations for our articles, and most of all, they pay via PayPal with low payout requirements.
Although I do not expect Seekyt to recover 100% of the earnings that we are losing from Google, I do expect to recover a significant percentage of that!
If I have learned one important lesson this weekend, and hopefully you have all learned the same lesson, it is that we cannot put all of our eggs in one basket. Don't put all of your articles on one site, and don't earn from only one program.
Even though AdSense may be a top paying website, there is enough evidence to demonstrate that you can earn supplementary income with another program without substituting your earnings with another.
Follow Seekyt.com through this transition and enjoy earning from new programs where your article library is already built. Continue writing and earning, too!
There is a great, AdSense-focused website on the way that will reward those of you who write only the highest-quality content. There is also a secret project which may see the light of day that is aimed at something completely different!
I plan on integrating both familiar ad sizes and unfamiliar ones - perhaps using different ad sizes and formats will lead to higher click through rates and more earnings. Since we don't have to follow AdSense's competitive network rules anymore, we are not forced to compete and place small, practically invisible ads at the bottom of the page anymore.
Finally, I want to admit that Seekyt.com has been focused on trying to be too many things at once. It worked for us for a while, but now it is time for Seekyt to expand into a network of new brands and websites that will be completely unique to what we are used to in terms of quality requirements and writing standards.
Seekyt has been an article writing website for nearly one full year, and we have come a long way in such a short period of time. I have no doubts that if you stick with Seekyt and me, you won't be disappointed in what the future has in store.



81 Comments
I have been writing about products for so long that I need a refresher course on writing authoritative content.
I did go back and read some of the content guidelines that Google has. They say no ads for any gun or tobacco-related stuff. I had found some great keywords for cigarette cases, but now I am not sure if writing about that is a no-no or not.
Either way, I am itching to start writing again! It will be nice to see ads filling up those blank spots again :)
2. You'll make the grade - your articles have always been great! And don't worry too much about product oriented articles, because they will always have a place :)
.If we all work together and support each other with comments, and sharing on twitter and other websites we will do just fine. Get traffic and hopefully earn from our advertisers. I hope that going forward with Seekyt that there will be some new TOS...that will keep the crap and spam out...the spinning has got to stop because it clearly hurts all of us. Thanks...for your hard work, I for one appreciate it.
I would like to add that I started earning on HP only after they started using their Hubpages Ad Program; AdSense gives me enough to buy a lollypop every month, but the other program gives me regular monthly payments which can buy me a lot more. I'm hoping the scenario will be the same here. Of course we'll stick around!
I will probably keep this model for other websites because it has worked very well. However, I am open to discussion if anyone has better ideas.
If you don't want the AdSense problem to happen again you may want to look into pooling systems ala Squidoo (please, base it on pageviews. Don't make me have to compete on a popularity contest) but I have no idea how complex is that to implement. But at the very least, yours would be the only AdSense account involved, and as such nobody could break the rules without you getting a notification.
If I ever hit traffic at that level, I'll definitely do it this way - although even this isn't enough to prevent loss, as in the case of Flixya.com whose API account was immediately removed several weeks ago.
Flixya was even one of Google AdSense's case studies about AdSense, and was also one of their prime examples regarding revenue sharing.
Just goes to show you that this is a risky business if not handled properly. I think the best thing to do is heavily moderate content, build the traffic back up, and then hopefully get accepted into the AdSense API as you suggest.
You've done an incredible job with this site, Tyler, especially given that it has been a one-person operation. Seekyt has grown and will continue to grow to be a top site that provides high-quality content and excellent opportunities for writers to earn. Thanks for your hard work and dedication.
Google is doing lots of adjustments with its pay per click ad model and they are favoring the big brand companies now, so the little guy has to create communities and look at alternative revenue models to survive in this competitive environment.
Nothing we can't handle. Keep up the good work Tyler. I will support your decisions and look forward to seeing your new plans.
I feel like it's only a matter of time before they attack all revenue sharing sites with some sort of excuse like the one they have used here. When forced to implement other ways to make money online besides Adsense it will help writers not to become so dependent on them and not worry every day about what tactics Google will use next.
Is it possible for Seekyt to have a similar arrangement?
Also I saw someone mention Skimlinks as another one.
They are sharing the impressions on VigLink so it would appear you could to the 70/30 thing or whatever you want.
The only thing about it is that it takes effort by writers to create the links, unlike Adsense context-based ads. That will turn off some and excite others.
Have you received confirmation from Google Adsense that ad serving will not be restored to Seekyt.com?
I am 90% confident that they sent their violation notice to a Seekyt member and not to me - it's far more likely that any page on this site is going to display the ads of someone other than myself at any given time. No matter what the violation was, and no matter who received it, I'm still responsible for the loss of AdSense on this site, but I really do wish they would at least tell me what happened.
Where would I add the image? At the top by intro?
(Hey...you know I am southern right? It is the same as Hi) It is an expression we use a lot.
I will roll out the new earnings programs as soon as I get the okay from infolinks. Chitika says they can take up to a week to approve accounts. I hope they get us online sooner, though.
In the meantime, I'll be looking into Skimlinks and Viglink to see if there is a good way to earn with those programs.
lperry,mentioned an advertiser, she had viewed a video on them, I checked them out and they looked interesting....whatever you choose I am sure that the earnings will be good.
(quote: Written by lperry, 2 days ago.
This page lists 10 good alternatives to Adsense :
http://www.rosswalker.co.uk/adsense_top10/ end quote)
I have been approved by infolinks, but I don't want to put only my own ads on Seekyt and leave everyone else out in the cold. Although I have built a revenue sharing program for it, I don't know if it will work or not based on some criteria that I need to know. I assume that the Infolinks people are off for the weekend (long weekend including today) and that they will get back to me sometime tomorrow.
I will not choose any advertiser who gets less traffic than Seekyt does - based on their Alexa rank. I think a lot of these programs are scams or elaborate revenue-sharing ad scripts of their own device. I was really interested in the two that Cameron mentioned (Vig and Skim), but I don't think they're a good fit since they are splitting the amount of revenue with you on what essentially amounts to Amazon links. I can't see that possibly earning anyone more than just inserting your own Amazon links at Seekyt and earning 100% of the commission.
There is no way I will pick anything that has a secondary revenue sharing scheme involved with it or requires more than "net 30" terms for writers to get paid.
I found another great program, for example, but the research shows me that the minimum payout is $1,000 and it is net 60 terms, meaning if you earned a thousand in April, you wouldn't get paid until the end of July. That's ridiculous to me, and the only reason I understand why Amazon does that is because people might return products. You can't really return ad clicks.
Anyway, I'll consider the image thing, and I'm hoping to have the programs up ASAP. I just need confirmation from them.
Luckily, since Seekyt didn't really rely that much on direct traffic, we haven't lost very much from this change. I expect the clicks and traffic to be exactly the same as before, or better, once the new ads are in place.
As for frames around images, I actually dislike the idea quite a bit. When I do use images I like to have creative control to make them look just right in my article and your editor does a fine job with that. I like to decide my own padding, etc. Frames look unnatural and separate from the article sometimes and I don't like it. An article with several pictures starts to get confusing with so many borders in it. Having said that, whatever you decide, you decide, and I'm sure it will be just fine.
I appreciate your stance on ad partners. I think you decide what you want to do and let the chips fall where they may. Personally I don't care if you take Infolinks income for a week while you figure it out. Go ahead. I know you care about the writers here and are working hard to implement a solution as quickly as you can.
I also think that it's hard to predict what writing will come once new partners are in place. In other words, optimizing for Adsense and optimizing for Infolinks or Amazon are two different things. It will end with different content and different authors who love it here. It will take a bit of time to see just what impact that has on new content.
example of frames around images
Also Jasmine mentioned somewhere about hubpages having a specific area for images....I am not sure what that looks like but she seemed to like it and she has good taste.
Whatever you decide I am okay with....
I don't think this is relevant at the moment, people can still publish content, and the upcoming ads will be served once the new programs are approved. I'm planning to edit Seekyt Resources as soon as we know for sure how things will go. I also checked Chitika's website, but haven't found their program policy for now. We'll see whether image placement will be relevant at all with Chitika.
Thanks.
I wish I had more information about Infolinks, but their code is so simple that I have had to get some feedback from them to make sure I'm doing this properly. I don't want to just hack in a revenue sharing program - anything that they can do to help will be better for all of us!
I will make infolinks show up by default on all articles, but I will have the option for you to turn them off on an article-by-article basis once it's released, if you don't like them. Chitika probably won't have that option - instead, it will probably just have layout options as usual
I am interested in seeing how Infolinks will pay, from what I have read about them on the internet they pay better than Kontera does.
Also giving us the option to turn them off on articles will be useful, because then it will be easier for me to compare revenue between articles.
You will also notice that using relevant words matters. Where keywords and phrases matter for search and Adsense, single words can really make a difference in Infolinks, since they will choose words to link automatically. Good words = good links/ads.
The only issue I see is that the Amazon modules here on Seekyt are really small and miniscule, so I would need to hyperlink words in my article that link back to related Amazon products and that could create problems with infolinks turned on.
What do you think?
My opinion is that people see the Amazon ads and only click on them if they think they might want to buy. The embed.ly ads were prettier but may have been a bit misleading to visitors.
The main problem with Embed.ly is that they wanted to charge me to use their service, which came out of nowhere when they were a free brand for such a long time. I didn't make enough money with their program to justify using the ad.
If Amazon had a similar ad available I would use it elsewhere in the article.
The main drawback about the new ads is that it might require a hundred clicks on your ads to actually see some sales, but as you build up that traffic, it significantly pays off. I think that I read something by another Seekyt member who was also reporting around 5% conversion rate.
If Amazon paid us the way AdSense does (per click) I would be upset about it too. Trust me!
Also, I have something in store that will put Seekyt's Amazon features to shame. If you are really excited about writing product reviews and earning with Amazon, I have something coming soon that will make you happy.
I have seen a reduction in click-through to Amazon since we changed form the single large Amazon module to the multiple product small modules. Significant. Maybe I'm alone on that but a solution that solves that is one I am very much in favor of.
I am mostly an information writer and have been learning how to write for products, which is more difficult for me unless I have actually used the product then I could draw on my personal experiences.
Since I like to research topics, information writing is easier for me to do which I think will compliment Chitika and Infolinks really well.
I just received an email this morning which said the sales manager should be in touch with me shortly to finish up the process of getting Seekyt online. It could be as soon as today or tomorrow.
I'm impatient too! I know we are all losing money here - me included and somewhat significantly - so just bear with me for right now. As soon as I get the reply, I'll have ads online within minutes. In the meantime, I suggest getting in an application to Chitika or Infolinks if you don't have accounts yet.
On a positive note, our search engine traffic has increased the last couple days to levels it's never been at, so we'll have that to look forward to once we get ads back online :)
Believe me I have been writing a year properly and am only just wising up, I only make around £30 a month with Google from everywhere, so I am not exactly bleeding money loss.
I am with Chitika and tried to add my site to Infolinks, so am registered but have no sites with them. You have to add each site on merit, so I don't know if I would have to wait until you have an Infolinks program or if I applied to them with my profile account from here.
Good news with the traffic and the fact that you are almost there with the ads. Hope to be able to write on the new site soon.x
Thanks.
But, yes, you are correct - they require $5 per day to start advertising your site on other websites in their publisher network. We are more concerned with joining their publisher network, so this doesn't apply to us.
Btw, I just took Google Adsense off my crochet blog. The ads were starting to not be relevant to the content. It may be because my posting has been rather infrequent for the past month. But even when I was posting frequently, I wasn't making much. What I'd really like is some blog sponsors but I don't think I have enough traffic yet for that.
Either way, keep me informed if you find a good source of revenue outside of AdSense! I know it can be exhausting when you are faced with the dilemma of needing a million impressions per month to make a decent living. Just hang in there!
Thanks.
davestone13, interesting use of words!!
Where does Google want them to be?
I just made another free blogger blog and the ads on the side bar show above the fold. I am just wondering...
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/01/page-layout-algorithm-improvement.html
Websites who have a large header, and who use sidebars and perhaps have one large rectangle ad above the fold aren't offering much content at that point.
Here is an article written about the page layout update which only has two sentences or so above the fold on a smaller resolution monitor:
http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2012/01/google-penalizes-above-fold-ad-heavy-sites/
This is what gets me about this update - AdSense tells us that if we want to make money with their program, our ads need to be above the fold as much as possible. That is the absolute truth, because I've learned from personal experience at Seekyt that ads below the fold don't even earn 10% of what the ads above the fold do.
So, in essence, if you want to make money, put your ads above the fold. AdSense also says to increase your earnings, you need to increase your traffic.
Google is penalizing sites with ads above the fold - very much so - and there are discussions on internet forums about this algorithm. No one has seen a return in traffic after making the required changes, hinting that it will take an entire reindex of the pages for Google to make the determination.
So, put ads above the fold, you lose traffic and money. Put ads below the fold, you don't lose traffic but you lose money from the prime ad positions. It's a lose lose situation, and Google is being quite vague about what is a violation and what isn't, because even sites like Seekyt, without a sidebar and with entire paragraphs of content above the fold, lost a somewhat significant amount of SE traffic from this update - somewhere in the vicinity of 10-15% of SE traffic.
I personally believe that Google may be trying to slow down their revenue streams a bit to test something else out, and I also think they may be diversifying their income streams in the near future.
I agree with your assessment. Take ads below the fold = lose money and keep traffic (or maybe increase). Show too many ads above the fold and get slapped for 5 months.
I think there is a middle ground from what I read, though as I stated exact truth will never be known. The middle ground is show an ad or two (not huge banners) above the fold and make sure content lives above the fold too. If done correctly you get 1 or 2 key ads above the fold and you stay in good graces. Mess it up and "slap".
I advise anyone with blogs to review your pages right now to see what you see when you land on the page. If you can't read content, beware.
I never lost my adsense, however ads were not relevant and my ranking on SEO was dropped. It took me3 months to clean up my blogs where amazon widgets were removed, Amazon products on posts gone and when my blogs were cleaned Google seemed to reinstate me very quick. However the damage was done...and it has been 4 months and my blogs are just now almost back to normal. I also had to remove all backlinks to other related content such as: View more related content by author...with 2 titles to other content...it was spam in Google's eyes.
Conflicting messages on the above the fold content is fair? Cake and eat it too anyone? They just have to be seen to give the user a good experience that's all, it's all PR.
I am also finding I have more traffic than I've ever had on here as well, I had a huge spike last Thursday, thanks to my squidoo Seekyt article. By continuing to publish, the articles stay on the front page way longer too.
From what I understand, it's not that you cannot have them there without fear of penalty, but you must have substantial content above the fold. I assume this was designed from the many sites I've seen in the past where you open the page and see nothing but ads until you scroll down to find the content.
If you aren't going to have any ads above the fold at all, you can expect virtually nothing in terms of revenue. Most ad clickers don't actually read much of the content at all - they often find the info, at a glance, isn't what they expected and click a relevant ad in hopes of finding what they want.
I only scanned the responses, but if the thought is to remove all ads above the fold, I guarantee very few writers will see any return on their articles.
How about a skyscraper column that sits above the fold in the left column and displays several ads one after the other, with ample content to the right?
Not sure what to do at this point.
Thanks landocheese for your input!
Of course, a slider linking to content may be considered content so maybe it's no problem. Hmmm.
I realize if your site is dependent on art up top you wouldn't want to take it out. For me it was acceptable.
Make sure content is visible and consumable starting above the fold and, once you do that, include ads up there as well. If ads push content below the fold you are headed for trouble.
I think a lot of sites are wasting space above the fold on a title and dead space that they could put to better use.
I am probably going to have to talk to them again on Monday and see if they are ever going to reply to my request. If I don't hear something soon, I'll just put up a generic code which will earn for the default WSID on your Infolinks account (the website you signed up with, or "0" to be precise).
What are you going to do???? In terms that I can understand please. :)
The PID is your publisher ID - just like your AdSense pub id. The WSID is your website ID. The website you use to sign up with their service has a value of 0 - it is your default website.
The WSID is the thing I am concerned about and working with Infolinks to figure out. I'm hoping that, perhaps, I might be able to set up a unique value specifically for Seekyt.com that any Seekyt writer could use. If I don't hear back from them soon enough, I will just leave the WSID 0 and anyone who wants to use Infolinks can do so and just have the impressions sent to their default Infolinks account.
I am hopeful that they will work with me. Although members here are not the owners of this domain, they do own their own content, and that is the stipulation I'm hoping Infolinks will help me work around so that we can set up a unique integration and referral process using Seekyt.com
This means that if you have already built a lot of traffic or backlinks to the article, it might not be a good idea to move it unless you don't mind parting with that traffic.